Occupational focus: Finance staff
In this article we look at pay levels for finance staff, using data from
IDSPay.co.uk. The analysis covers three job levels from the IDS Job Evaluation Scheme – a series of job levels allowing roles to be grouped by the weight of knowledge, skills and level of responsibility.
Finance assistant
Finance assistants are usually fairly junior positions in the finance department. Staff are responsible for a range of routine data entry and banking tasks. An analysis of salary data shows that finance assistants are typically paid an annual salary of around £18,000. Salary ranges typically start at around £16,000 and rise to a maximum of around £20,000 a year.
Finance officerFinance officers are expected to assist in the efficient functioning of the finance department. Duties generally involve the preparation of sales invoices, the processing of purchase invoices, cash receipts and payments and the reconciliation of nominal ledger accounts. Finance officers are typically paid around £23,000 a year. Salaries start at around the £21,000 mark, rising to £25,000 at the maximum.
Finance manager
This senior role is usually held by a qualified or part-qualified accountant. Finance managers are responsible for the day-to-day running of the finance department and report to the financial controller, finance director or company secretary. Typically finance managers are paid a minimum of around £32,000 and £40,000 at the maximum. The lowest starting salary for a finance manager in our sample is £23,459 at childcare nursery Hollybank Trust. At the other end, the highest maximum salary of £59,934 is paid at Nationwide.
Visit
www.IDSPay.co.uk for further details of the service, and to sign up for your free trial.
Pay prospects for 2010: hopes for a recovery persist despite the economic outlook remaining uncertain
The median pay settlement level for 2009 is 2.3 per cent. Higher-level awards have continued to occur despite freezes numbering around a third of pay settlements. This has created a noticeable division in the distribution of pay settlements: pay freezes on one side and increases at 2 per cent and above on the other. Excluding pay freezes in 2009, the median pay settlement level is 2.9 per cent. Our recent survey of reward specialists shows that three-fifths of those firms that froze pay in 2009 will award pay increases once more in 2010.
Many of the gloomiest predictions on pay made at the start of the year failed to materialise. There were not widespread pay cuts or pay freezes across the board.
Pay freezes are highly sectoral with the motor industry, construction, bulk chemicals, road and air transport and the media particularly susceptible. Sectors which are less affected include energy, finance (though this has been balanced by large-scale job losses), pharmaceuticals, bus and rail transport, food retailing and food manufacture.
In many cases pay freezes have been justified through commitments to safeguard jobs. Firms are conscious of the need to retain a skilled workforce for when the market eventually picks up and are trying to avoid unnecessary cuts.
In a year when deflation emerged for the first time since the 1960s, RPI inflation became much less important as an indicator in pay setting. However as inflation is expected to rise in 2010, the level of RPI will become a key factor in pay negotiations once more, providing an upward pressure on pay. Forecasts published by IDS suggest RPI inflation will return to around 2.5 or 3 per cent early in 2010 and stay around 3 per cent for most of the year.
The
IDS Pay Report special issue on pay planning for 2010 is available now.
Click here for further details.
Annual leave ruined by sickness can be taken at another time
Although the relationship between sick leave and annual leave has had much attention in recent years, most employees and employers have, until now, regarded annual leave ruined by sickness as unavoidable bad luck. However, in the recent case of Pereda v Madrid Movilidad SA, the European Court of Justice has held that the Working Time Directive gives a worker who is on sick leave during a period of annual leave the right to take the lost annual leave at a different time. The worker has this right even if it is necessary to take the replacement leave after the end of the leave year in which the leave was originally arranged. Under the Directive, every worker is entitled to four weeks of paid annual leave. The Court also confirmed that an employer’s failure to allow a worker on sick leave to take annual leave breaches this right. The decision builds on a previous ECJ ruling that workers on long-term sick leave are nonetheless entitled to accrue annual leave.
Employers have been quick to criticise the ECJ’s decision, citing the cost of providing additional annual leave and potential exploitation by unscrupulous employees who pretend to be sick in order to claim more annual leave at a later date. Employers concerned about the judgment would be wise to review their sickness policies to include a procedure to deal with sickness during pre-arranged annual leave. Most workplaces operate a system of self-certification for short-term illness – employers may feel the need to consider whether such a system remains appropriate for sickness occurring while the worker is on annual leave.
The many and varied issues raised by the Working Time Directive are considered in the
IDS Working Time Handbook, published later this month.
Click here for further details.